top of page
Search

Why There is NO EVOLUTION on EARTH

The same very old greedy white folks (who the Heavenly Father recognizes as Easu) are keeping the earth in a crippled, sick state with dirty fossil fuels to keep their old played out selves rich and in power. Easu is suppressing clean energy an oppressing the real Israelites (so-called Black folk, Hispanics, and Native Americans; the former slaves).


There so-called Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans are the real Israelites, and there are Black folk (Israelites) in Africa inventing great innovative inventions concerning energy and many other ground breaking inventions that will bring Earth out of the Dark Age of Suppression of Knowledge and Evolution.


Pure hatred of the real Israelites (Black Folks) is the engine behind all of this hatred so great that they are willing to allow the whole Earth to be destroyed with pollution, rather than stop the oppression and the rise of a new Kingdom that the whole Universe is waiting for, just like Earth and every living thing on it.


On the Sabbath/Saturday, November 15, 1884, an international conference was opened by the chancellor of the newly-created German Empire at his official residence on Wilhelmstrasse, in Berlin. Sitting around a horseshoe-shaped table in a room with representatives from every “White country, and not a single leader from any “Black” Nation or Country in Africa, which was the topic of the meeting, with a big map of Africa hanging on the wall in their meeting room.


Including a short break for Christmas and the New Year, the West African Conference of Berlin would last 104 days, ending on February 26, 1885. In the 135 years since, the conference has come to represent the late 19th-century European Scramble and Partition of the continent, sketching out national borders on the continent with no idea of what existed on the ground they were parcelling out, which is the wealth of natural minerals, metals, and resources.


It established the rules for the conquest and partition of Africa, in the process legitimising the ideas of Africa as a playground for outsiders, its mineral wealth as a resource for the outside world not for Africans and its fate as a matter not to be left to Africans.


The event was “Diplomatic” in form, it was economic in fact for white folks rich at the expense keeping black folks oppressed and at a dysfunctional state. And it is true that while it was dressed up as a humanitarian summit to look at the welfare of locals, its agenda was almost purely economic, oppression, murder, and theft. Few on the continent or in the African diaspora were fooled. A week before it closed, the Lagos Observer declared that “the world had, perhaps, never witnessed a robbery on so large a scale.” Six years later, another editor of a Lagos newspaper comparing the legacy conference to the slave trade said: “A forcible possession of our land has taken the place of a forcible possession of our person.” Theodore Holly, the first black Protestant Episcopal Bishop in the US, condemned the delegates as having “come together to enact into law, national rapine, robbery and murder”.


The outcome of the conference was the General Act signed and ratified by all but one of the 14 nations at the table, the US being the sole exception. Some of its main features were the establishment of a regime of free trade stretching across the middle of Africa, the development of which became the rationale for the recognition of the Congo Free State and its subsequent 13-year horror, the abolition of the overland slave trade as well as the principle of “effective occupation”.


Though the attempt to create a free trade area in Africa and therefore keep the continent from becoming both a spark for, and a theatre of conflict between the European powers, was ultimately doomed. At the time of the conference, 80 percent of Africa remained under traditional and local control. The Europeans only had influence on the coast. Following it, they started grabbing chunks of land inland.

However, to get their claims over African land accepted, European states had to demonstrate that they could actually control the area. Military victory proved to be the easy part. To govern, they had reorganized Africans into units they could understand and control. The colonial period was marked “by systematic inventions of African traditions – ethnicity, customary law, ‘traditional’ religion. Before colonialism Africa a person could easily identify the real Israelites who had migrated from Jerusalem to Africa, escaping persecution; after it, African identities of ‘tribe’, gender and generation were all bounded by the invented tradition.


That first-ever international conference on Africa established a template for how the world deals with the continent. Today, Africa is still seen primarily as a source for raw materials for the outside world and an arena for them to compete over. Conferences about the continent are rarely held on the continent itself and rarely care about the views of ordinary Africans.


The sight of African heads of state assembling in foreign capitals to beg for favors is a re-enactment of the Sultan of Zanzibar’s pleading to attend a conference where he would be the main course.


Despite achieving independence for the most part in the 1950s and 1960s, many African countries have continued along the destructive path laid out in Berlin. Former Tanzanian President Julius Nyerere declared: “We have artificial ‘nations’ carved out at the Berlin Conference in 1884, and today we are struggling to build these nations into stable units of human society… we are in danger of becoming the most destroyed, broken up continent of the world.” Ethnicity and tribalism continue to be the bane of African politics.



 
 
 

Comments


Post: Blog2_Post

©2020 by SIDNEY BIGHAM CORPORATION. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page